ReadMyStudent logo
Faculty writing recommendation letters
AI drafting tools
Encrypted storage
Integrity preserved
For Faculty

Help students without drowning in repeat work.

Most faculty want to advocate for students — but the current system multiplies effort, scatters documents, and turns deadlines into inbox chaos. ReadMyStudent keeps integrity intact while reducing friction.

1 strong letter
30–90 min
Busy seasons
dozens of requests
Portals + deadlines
always different
Always free for faculty • Consent-first • Secure by design
The Workflow

Two jobs, both broken: writing + submitting.

Faculty write locally (Word, Google Docs, email drafts), then re-submit repeatedly to different systems with different rules.

Faculty writes letters
Often reused with customization
  • Stored locally (Word, Google Docs, email drafts)
  • No centralized system
  • No version control
  • No encryption standard
  • No ownership clarity
ReadMyStudent adds a secure home + versioned drafting workflow.
Faculty submits (repeatedly)
Every portal is different
  • Different portals
  • Different logins
  • Different formats
  • Different deadlines
  • Reminder emails flood inboxes
  • Missed deadlines happen all the time
ReadMyStudent reduces rework by managing links + approvals with auditability.
Modern volume and overlapping deadlines
Modern reality

The old model collapses under modern volume.

  • Students apply to 10–30 programs
  • Faculty write dozens of letters
  • Deadlines overlap
  • Systems don’t talk to each other
  • Everything resets every cycle
This is why:
Letters are delayed
Students miss opportunities
Faculty burn out
Quality declines
Pain Points

Reduce the workload without compromising integrity.

A brief list here (you can expand into deeper subpages later): faculty pain points + institutional concerns.

Faculty Pain Points
  • Rewriting similar letters
  • Deadline overload
  • Portal fatigue
  • No central archive
  • No way to “approve once, reuse many”
  • No secure ownership
  • No compensation or recognition
Institutional Pain Points
  • Fraud risk
  • Ghostwritten letters
  • Identity verification
  • Inconsistent standards
  • Compliance headaches
What a modern system must do
  • Preserve strong letters securely
  • Enable reuse with consent
  • Reduce duplicate effort
  • Provide verification & encryption
  • Maintain confidentiality
Our Solutions for Faculty

Less repetition. More advocacy.

Students don’t just want a letter — they want advocacy, continuity, trust, and leverage. A system that preserves strong letters and reduces friction amplifies opportunity.

Rewriting similar letters
You end up retyping the same structure, only swapping details.
AI-assisted drafting + reusable templates
Start from a strong base, pull in student-provided highlights, and keep consistency without losing personalization.
Deadline overload + reminders
Overlapping deadlines create constant inbox pressure.
Clear status + deadline tracking
A structured workflow that shows what’s due, what’s drafted, and what’s approved — without email chaos.
Portal fatigue
Every program uses a different portal with different formats.
Centralized requests + controlled sharing
Students initiate requests; faculty approve and share through secure links and verifiable access rules.
No archive, no ownership clarity
Letters live across files, drafts, and inboxes with no standard.
Secure archive + version history
A consistent home for letters with encryption, audit trails, and clear consent rules.
Your time is valuable.

ReadMyStudent is built to respect faculty workload while preserving confidentiality and integrity — so strong letters can remain strong, without burning you out.

Faculty tools, workflow, and verification
Faster drafting
Verification
Encryption